As a 5th grade teacher
at Matt Arthur Elementary School, I was already required to perform this
assessment on my entire class. I did not expect, however, to have to administer
the Elementary Portion of this assessment. I came to this realization after
attempting to administer the Upper Level and realizing that only a few of my
children were able to even complete the assessment without reaching their
frustration levels and even fewer were able to score moderately well. After
seeing this, I decided to administer the Elementary to the whole class (even to
the few who did well on Upper Level) just to have two class composites to learn
from.
I did
not expect the Inventory to be so enlightening. After completing the
assessment, which I did not find difficult or time consuming, I was able to see
that the majority of my class needed further remediation in the area of Harder
Suffixes, Bases or Roots, and Unaccented Final Syllables. I also see that many
of my students can be grouped and remediated in small groups in the areas of
syllable junction, inflected endings, and other vowels. I was surprised to see
that a couple of my children need remediation in areas as far back in the
spelling stages as digraphs and long vowels.
This
will help to mold my teaching by allowing me to focus my instruction in very
specific areas rather than taking a shot in the dark with my children need work
with. I can pinpoint the skills that need further instruction and very
adequately assign tasks that will improve that said skill.
Hi Christina,
ReplyDeleteI too found out things that I did not expect to find. I thought my students would have done much better than they did. I knew many of the students were good readers and I just assumed that this would directly correlate with their spelling. However, just as the authors point out in the text, "Reading and spelling are related but do not necessarily mirror each other."